Zensun said:
Have to say, I don’t like the layout of the title at all. It wasn’t until I got to the bottom of your post that I realised the title’s Lost Heroes and not Heroes Lost.
…
I assume you’re trying to make the title ‘different’ to stand out, but personally don’t think the way you have it right now is the way to do it. If it worked, plenty of other publishers would already be doing it.

Thanks for you’re feedback Zensun. I’ll keep you’re feedback in mind when I revise the layout next (still focusing on content before doing really launching into layout and presentation).

stelt said:
SVG stands for “Scalable Vector Graphics”, not “Scalar Vector Graphics”

Thank you. Post updated.

SVG stands for “Scalable Vector Graphics”, not “Scalar Vector Graphics”

Have to say, I don’t like the layout of the title at all. It wasn’t until I got to the bottom of your post that I realised the title’s Lost Heroes and not Heroes Lost.

Since ‘western’ text reads left to right, top to bottom, your title leaves a new reader guessing as to how it’s meant to be read. Since it’s usual to see multi-line text where the first line is indented, I read it Heroes Lost. But even if I had interpreted the title properly, I find it an annoying layout.

You can easily resize the text to fit on one line, or lay it out properly — ‘Heroes’ top-left-justified, ‘Lost’ bottom right-justitified*. I assume you’re trying to make the title ‘different’ to stand out, but personally don’t think the way you have it right now is the way to do it. If it worked, plenty of other publishers would already be doing it.

*Edit: Thankfully proofread before posting for once. There I go again. See, I have the title wrong in my head now. That should read: ‘Lost’ top-left-justified, ‘Heroes’ bottom right-justitified.

[...] (read about the construction of this image on my personal blog!) [...]